🤝
Employee Relationsmedium priority

Navigating Internal Hiring: Manager Transparency Matters

An employee feels misled by their manager regarding an internal job posting, discovering the role was essentially pre-determined for another candidate. This situation damaged trust and wasted the employee's time and effort in applying.

Target audience: experienced managers
Framework: Crucial Conversations
2103 words • 9 min read

Managing a Know-It-All Employee: Using the Johari Window

The Management Challenge

Dealing with a "know-it-all" employee presents a significant challenge for managers. This behavior, often characterized by excessive self-confidence, constant correction of others, and a reluctance to acknowledge their own mistakes, can erode team morale, stifle collaboration, and hinder overall productivity. The impact extends beyond mere annoyance; it can create a toxic environment where team members feel undervalued, unheard, and hesitant to contribute their ideas. This ultimately leads to decreased innovation, increased conflict, and potentially higher employee turnover. The challenge lies in addressing this behavior constructively, without alienating the employee or suppressing their potential contributions, while simultaneously safeguarding the team's well-being and performance. Ignoring the issue allows the negative behavior to fester, reinforcing the "know-it-all's" perception of their own infallibility and further damaging team dynamics.

Understanding the Root Cause

The "know-it-all" behavior often stems from a complex interplay of psychological and systemic issues. At its core, it can be rooted in insecurity. The individual may feel a deep-seated need to prove their competence and maintain a sense of control, especially in environments where they perceive a threat to their status or expertise. This insecurity can manifest as a defensive mechanism, where constantly asserting their knowledge becomes a way to mask their own doubts and vulnerabilities.

Systemic issues within the organization can also contribute. A culture that rewards individual achievement over collaboration, or one that lacks clear feedback mechanisms, can inadvertently encourage this behavior. If the "know-it-all" has historically been praised for their perceived expertise without receiving constructive criticism, they may continue to operate under the assumption that their approach is always correct. Furthermore, a lack of psychological safety within the team can exacerbate the problem, as other members may be hesitant to challenge the "know-it-all," even when they are wrong. Traditional approaches, such as direct confrontation or reprimands, often fail because they trigger defensiveness and reinforce the individual's need to protect their ego. These approaches also neglect the underlying insecurities and systemic factors that contribute to the behavior.

The Johari Window Framework Solution

The Johari Window is a psychological tool created by Joseph Luft and Harry Ingham in 1955. It helps individuals understand their relationship with themselves and others. It's particularly useful in this scenario because it provides a framework for increasing self-awareness and fostering open communication, which are crucial for addressing the "know-it-all" behavior constructively. The Johari Window consists of four quadrants:

* Open Area (Arena): What is known by the person about themselves and is also known by others.
* Blind Spot: What is unknown by the person about themselves but is known by others.
* Hidden Area (Façade): What is known by the person about themselves but is unknown by others.
* Unknown Area: What is unknown by the person about themselves and is also unknown by others.

Applying the Johari Window to the "know-it-all" situation involves helping the individual expand their Open Area by reducing their Blind Spot and Hidden Area. This is achieved through a combination of self-disclosure and feedback from others. By encouraging the individual to share their thoughts and feelings (reducing the Hidden Area) and providing them with honest and constructive feedback (reducing the Blind Spot), you can help them gain a more accurate understanding of how their behavior impacts others. This increased self-awareness can then lead to a change in behavior. The framework works because it focuses on understanding and growth rather than blame and punishment. It creates a safe space for dialogue and encourages the individual to take ownership of their behavior.

Core Implementation Principles

  • Principle 1: Foster a Culture of Feedback: Create an environment where giving and receiving feedback is normalized and valued. This involves establishing clear guidelines for constructive feedback, providing training on how to deliver and receive feedback effectively, and regularly soliciting feedback from team members. This helps to shrink the "Blind Spot" of the "know-it-all" by providing them with insights into how their behavior is perceived by others.

  • Principle 2: Encourage Self-Disclosure: Create opportunities for the individual to share their thoughts, feelings, and concerns in a safe and supportive environment. This can be achieved through one-on-one conversations, team meetings, or even anonymous surveys. By encouraging self-disclosure, you can help the individual reduce their "Hidden Area" and build trust with their colleagues.

  • Principle 3: Promote Active Listening: Emphasize the importance of active listening skills within the team. This involves paying attention to both verbal and nonverbal cues, asking clarifying questions, and summarizing what has been said to ensure understanding. When the "know-it-all" feels heard and understood, they may be less likely to feel the need to constantly assert their knowledge.
  • Step-by-Step Action Plan

    Immediate Actions (Next 24-48 Hours)

    1. Self-Reflection: - Before addressing the employee, take time to reflect on your own biases and assumptions. Are you reacting to the behavior objectively, or are there personal factors influencing your perception? Document specific instances of the behavior that are problematic and their impact on the team.
    2. Schedule a Private Conversation: - Arrange a one-on-one meeting with the employee in a private and neutral setting. Frame the meeting as an opportunity for professional development and growth, rather than a disciplinary action.
    3. Prepare Opening Remarks: - Craft an opening statement that is non-accusatory and focuses on your observations of the employee's behavior and its impact on the team. For example, "I've noticed that you often share your expertise in meetings, which is valuable. However, I've also observed that sometimes this can prevent others from sharing their ideas."

    Short-Term Strategy (1-2 Weeks)

    1. Initial Conversation (Johari Window Introduction): - During the meeting, introduce the concept of the Johari Window in a simplified manner. Explain the four quadrants and how they relate to self-awareness and interpersonal communication. Emphasize that the goal is to help them understand how their behavior is perceived by others and to identify areas for growth. Timeline: Within the first week.
    2. Solicit Self-Assessment: - Ask the employee to reflect on their own strengths and weaknesses, and how they believe they are perceived by their colleagues. Encourage them to identify areas where they might be unintentionally hindering collaboration or communication. Timeline: During the initial conversation and as a follow-up task.
    3. Gather Feedback from Team Members: - With the employee's consent (and ensuring anonymity), solicit feedback from other team members about their interactions with the employee. Focus on specific behaviors and their impact, rather than making personal judgments. Timeline: Over the next week, ensuring confidentiality.

    Long-Term Solution (1-3 Months)

    1. Develop an Action Plan: - Based on the feedback received and the employee's self-assessment, collaboratively develop an action plan with specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for improving their communication and collaboration skills. This might include attending workshops on active listening, practicing empathy, or seeking mentorship from a senior colleague. Sustainable Approach: Regular check-ins and adjustments to the plan as needed. Measurement: Track progress towards SMART goals and solicit ongoing feedback from team members.
    2. Implement a Mentorship Program: - Pair the employee with a mentor who can provide guidance and support in developing their interpersonal skills. The mentor should be someone who is respected within the organization and has a proven track record of effective communication and collaboration. Sustainable Approach: Ongoing mentorship meetings and support. Measurement: Track the employee's progress in developing their interpersonal skills and solicit feedback from the mentor.
    3. Reinforce Positive Behaviors: - Publicly acknowledge and reward the employee when they demonstrate positive behaviors, such as actively listening to others, acknowledging their own mistakes, or contributing to team discussions in a constructive manner. This will reinforce the desired behaviors and encourage them to continue on their path of growth. Sustainable Approach: Integrate positive reinforcement into regular performance reviews and team meetings. Measurement: Track the frequency of positive behaviors and solicit feedback from team members about the employee's contributions.

    Conversation Scripts and Templates

    Initial Conversation

    Opening: "Hi [Employee Name], thanks for meeting with me. I wanted to have a conversation about your professional development and how we can support your growth within the team. I value your expertise and contributions, and I've also noticed some patterns in how you interact with the team that I think we can explore together."
    If they respond positively: "That's great to hear. I've been reading about a concept called the Johari Window, which is a tool for understanding how we perceive ourselves and how others perceive us. I think it could be helpful in this situation. Would you be open to learning more about it?"
    If they resist: "I understand that this might be a sensitive topic, and I want to assure you that my intention is not to criticize you, but rather to help you grow and develop as a professional. I believe that by working together, we can identify areas where you can further enhance your communication and collaboration skills. Can we agree to have an open and honest conversation about this?"

    Follow-Up Discussions

    Check-in script: "Hi [Employee Name], I wanted to check in on how you're feeling about the action plan we discussed. Are there any challenges you're facing, or any support you need from me or the team?"
    Progress review: "Let's take some time to review the progress you've made on your action plan. Can you share some specific examples of how you've been applying the strategies we discussed, and what impact they've had on your interactions with the team?"
    Course correction: "Based on our discussion and the feedback I've received, it seems like we might need to adjust the action plan slightly. Perhaps we can focus more on [specific area for improvement] or explore some alternative strategies. What are your thoughts?"

    Common Pitfalls to Avoid

    Mistake 1: Publicly Criticizing the Employee


    Why it backfires: Public criticism can be humiliating and can damage the employee's reputation and self-esteem. It can also create a defensive reaction, making them less receptive to feedback.
    Better approach: Address the behavior in private, focusing on specific instances and their impact, rather than making personal judgments.

    Mistake 2: Ignoring the Underlying Insecurities


    Why it backfires: The "know-it-all" behavior is often a symptom of deeper insecurities. Ignoring these insecurities will only address the surface-level behavior, without addressing the root cause.
    Better approach: Create a safe and supportive environment where the employee feels comfortable sharing their thoughts and feelings. Encourage them to explore their insecurities and develop coping mechanisms.

    Mistake 3: Failing to Provide Specific Feedback


    Why it backfires: Vague feedback is unhelpful and can leave the employee feeling confused and unsure of how to improve.
    Better approach: Provide specific examples of the behavior that is problematic and its impact on the team. Offer concrete suggestions for how the employee can improve their communication and collaboration skills.

    When to Escalate

    Escalate to HR when:


  • • The employee's behavior is creating a hostile work environment for other team members.

  • • The employee is consistently resistant to feedback and unwilling to change their behavior.

  • • The employee's behavior is violating company policies or ethical guidelines.
  • Escalate to your manager when:


  • • You are unable to effectively manage the employee's behavior on your own.

  • • The employee's behavior is significantly impacting team performance or morale.

  • • You need additional resources or support to address the issue.
  • Measuring Success

    Week 1 Indicators


  • • [ ] The employee acknowledges the need for improvement.

  • • [ ] The employee actively participates in the development of an action plan.

  • • [ ] The employee begins to implement the strategies outlined in the action plan.
  • Month 1 Indicators


  • • [ ] The employee demonstrates improved communication and collaboration skills.

  • • [ ] Team members report a more positive and collaborative work environment.

  • • [ ] The employee actively seeks feedback from others and incorporates it into their behavior.
  • Quarter 1 Indicators


  • • [ ] The employee consistently demonstrates positive behaviors and contributes to team discussions in a constructive manner.

  • • [ ] The employee is seen as a valuable and respected member of the team.

  • • [ ] The employee's performance has improved as a result of their improved communication and collaboration skills.
  • Related Management Challenges


  • Managing Conflict: Addressing the "know-it-all" behavior often involves managing conflict within the team.

  • Building Trust: Creating a safe and supportive environment requires building trust among team members.

  • Providing Constructive Feedback: Effectively addressing the behavior requires providing constructive feedback that is specific, actionable, and non-judgmental.
  • Key Takeaways


  • Core Insight 1: The "know-it-all" behavior is often a symptom of deeper insecurities and systemic issues.

  • Core Insight 2: The Johari Window provides a valuable framework for increasing self-awareness and fostering open communication.

  • Core Insight 3: Addressing the behavior requires a combination of feedback, self-reflection, and positive reinforcement.

  • Next Step: Schedule a one-on-one meeting with the employee to begin the conversation.
  • Related Topics

    internal hiringmanager transparencyemployee moralecareer growthcommunication

    Need personalized guidance for your specific situation?

    Our AI Manager Coach provides tailored advice for your unique leadership challenges, helping you become a more effective and confident manager.